Which strategy the organism's defense system should adopt? Mathematical approaches from the perspective of the optimal control
Elimination of danger (e.g. pathogens) is an important activity for
organisms. From this viewpoint, the optimization analysis is
applicable to study the reaction of immune system.
There are different patterns of defense observed in immune
system. Higher vertebrates have both innate immunity and acquired
immunity, whilst lower animals don't. Some proteins for defense are
stored beforehand, whilst others are produced after infection. It is
likely that some advantages lay under the realized patterns of
defense. The organisms should prevent pathogen growth, with saving
defense cost (e.g. tissue injury). I present the optimal defense
pattern using the above criterion.
First, we focus on difference between two defense options,
such as delay, cost, effectiveness, and uncertainty of information
available. If defense proteins are produced via gene expression
after pathogen attack the host (infection), the pathogen abundance
increases quickly until the level of defense protein becomes enough.
In contrast, if defense proteins are produced and stored before the
infection, the host can escape from the disadvantage. However, the
storing holds another disadvantage -- stored proteins can be
wasteful, because the information available before the infection is
limited. Taking these into consideration, I discuss the optimal
defense strategy.
Second, I present a model clarifying dynamic defense strategy
of the adaptive immune response. "Bang-bang control", to produce
"immune activity" is an economical strategy for the host's immune
system. The switching 0 and 1 continues just before the end of
lifetime. This result suggests that some immune activity can be
maintained in the host body even if no risk of re-infection is.